I nodded to the old man across the way,
Touched my finger to my brow in acknowledgement
Of the way he looked at me.
He returned the touch, hand slowly raised and finger bent,
A nod just faint enough to see the glitter in his eye
To say he wasn’t saluting now.
And the woman by his side sat still and smiled.
She glanced at me and nudged his arm, then turned away,
Speaking to the air.
I watched, waiting for the moment to have my say
But when the pair took hand and turned back to me
I fudged the chance.
The crowd came in, the noisy throng, the drinking song.
The drinking song? A rhyme no longer relevant
But you’re okay with the thrashing, spinning element
Of slot machine and nearly karaoke.
So, I look to the woman in the glass,
The face I scarcely see and wonder what I would have said.
What I would have dared to ask.
J Johnson Smith 2014
Looking into the poem:
A poem of nineteen lines. Verses one and two of six lines, third verse of four and last verse of three lines. The lines vary in length, in metre and rhyme.
A rhyme (me) occurs in verse one, end of the line one and is immediately linked to ‘he’ at the beginning of line two. Another rhyme at end of lines two and six (brow and now). The next two verses are shorter being four and three lines respectively. Verse three is the change of rhythm and more rhyme. A sneaky para-rhyme between ‘okay’ and ‘karaoke’. The last verse is the shortest with three lines, the middle being longest. You might consider that line could be split at ‘and’ to make it four lines but this would have added a pause, albeit minor that would have changed metre which, as it stands, harks back to the metre of the last two lines in the first verse, lines of seven iambs.
In the first verse the author sees an old man nearby and acknowledges him with a form of salute which is less used today, possibly a more casual form of military salute or that one now sees in films as a touching of the forelock from peasant to gentry, farmer to squire, or maybe an equivalent of raising a hat to someone. Not a sign usually signifying rank of one to another but more an acknowledgement of respect. It is returned, slowly, possibly due to age, maybe arthritis, as the old man’s finger is bent, though it is not stated.
And a nod, more acknowledgement, of the author’s presence but then the remaining half and one line, where his eye glitters, adds to the scene, apparently to show he is not saluting in a military or ‘servile’ way. The glitter suggests to the reader that despite his age, maybe fragility of body the old man still has a strong sense of self-image. ‘Glitter” might also mean anger, stubborness or humour but so far we cannot tell. My initial reading from the opening lines is that it is just an avowal of his own self, still there despite his age. As yet we do not know where they are or who; any relationship, apart from author and old man.
End of fourth line rhyming with end of second line. Last word in last line ‘now’ rhyming with ‘brow’, mid second line and maybe para-rhyme with ‘eye’ at end of line five. In this verse the first three lines matched the second three, with a slight tweak of metre.
The woman, a companion to the old man, looked at the author and nudged the old man. Why? To attract his attention to the author or away from? Why turn away talking? To someone out of sight? So the old man could not hear, or maybe so the author could not hear. We assume she turned away on purpose but do not know why. Perhaps she was obliged to turn away for some unknown reason despite wanting to talk to one or both, may e despite actually talking to one or both but words just lost as she moved.
So the author waited and it seems the old man and woman hold hands and look towards the author but for some reason the author is unable to speak to the couple. No specifics why but in the next verse there is a change in the scene.
There is noise, people seem to arrive and talk of drinking, gambling and singing. And a change of speed in the rhythm of words, more rhyme to speed the reading and the two words of ‘thrashing, spinning’ side by side as two different movements to break the feel of the previous two verses. Still no specifics of where this event takes place but it feels like a pub or club. Another reading could be that it is the world that is noisily bursting in on the two people, three if you include the author. Is the author actually seeing this or imagining it? It seems an odd event for ‘chaos’ to arrive so abruptly, would two elderly people sit in that place knowing what might happen?
The last verse might hold some answers.
‘So I look to the woman in the glass’. Two thoughts. Is the glass a drinking glass or mirror? Is the woman that in the previous verses or the author? If the author then it offers a different possibility to the earlier use of ‘glitter’ as it may be for a secret, shared with the old man. Perhaps the woman with the glass is drinking too much, a secret that is known by the old man. Two drinkers sharing a secret? If the meaning is of a mirror then is the author seeing her own face or imagines she sees the woman to whom she ‘wasn’t’ talking.
‘The face I scarcely see and wonder what I would have said’. This line seems to move the previous thought away from it being the authors own face seen in the glass/mirror. Also increasing the thought that it is a mirror rather than drinking glass. The word ‘scarcely’ also has potential for several meanings: infrequently, or unclearly. Another use might be that the character of the person is now unclear or infrequently understood. The author might be lost for words after all. Both people may be strangers to her, less likely to each other. Maybe just the woman if you lean to the idea that subject is not the author.
Assuming the author is the main subject of the poem, the other two characters are relevant to the author’s history in some way but the accuracy of the event, or as a memory, becomes doubtful. The face in the glass/mirror shifts the reality of the memory into an area of imagination, maybe of dream with the quick change of circumstance in the verses.
Third line, last line: ‘What I would have dared to ask.’ last word rhyming with end of first line. A short line that opens and leaves open the whole poem. Not a question, and the emphasis lies on the word ‘dared’ . We are left with the author being left somewhat stranded, having had the chance of a meeting, in a room, possibly in a bar and at a critical moment an overwhelming interruption disrupts all thought. Last verse gives a moment of reflection (!) which leaves the reader with a hanging thread of thought, of ‘what question?’
It feels like an important, personal question, could it be even of life and death? Even life after death given the quasi- dream elements we can move towards.
Finally the title, a first clue? Likely unnoticed except as irrelevant to the main poem until near the end and then it might be thought of as blatantly obvious. ‘Mist’ being the unclear, misty vision in the third verse and also an alternative spelling for ‘missed’ and it’s various connotations such as ‘missed opportunity/ies in the poem’s event and in the joint histories of the characters. Also about the emotion of the author in missing the presence of the couple. Just a few thoughts on the journey of the poem, no doubt other options are available. ‘How to Read a Poem’ was useful in writing this analysis.